ABSTRACT
Objective@#The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has not yet been controlled and herd immunity through vaccination against COVID-19 has been considered the best option to prevent the spread of COVID-19 worldwide. We encountered several patients in our emergency department presenting with adverse reactions after COVID-19 vaccinations. Hence, we investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with adverse reactions after vaccination. @*Methods@#In South Korea, 10,510 doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was administered to 5,304 medical staff. To investigate adverse reactions, we reviewed the case report forms from the vaccination centers and the medical charts from the date of first dose administration until two weeks after the last planned second dose. @*Results@#A total of 187 cases, out of the 10,510, experienced adverse reactions and these were more common in females. Dizziness (44.4%), nausea and vomiting (28.3%), and fever (24.1%) were the most reported adverse reactions. Immediate adverse reactions included dizziness, nausea, and vomiting, palpitation, sensory changes, and delayed adverse reactions included fever, myalgia, headache, nausea, and vomiting. The delayed reactions of fever and myalgia were significantly more common after the second, rather than after the first dose (P<0.01 and P=0.03, respectively). One case of anaphylaxis was reported. All adverse reactions improved after conservative care. @*Conclusion@#Our findings show diverse adverse reactions to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, but none of them required hospitalization. However, since this vaccine has been manufactured using a newly developed technique, more research focused on the clinical significance of the adverse reactions is necessary.
ABSTRACT
Background@#According to the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic experience, many emergency departments experience difficulties in responding to emerging infectious diseases and this has led to a public health crisis. Our emergency department (ED) is designed to respond to mass outbreaks of infection. Three major preparations were taken to respond to infectious disease; first, to improve the emergency department facilities;second, to created programs to respond to each phase of an epidemic of COVID-19; lastly, to implemented education and training to promote the safety of medical staff. We would like to share the actual responses and statistics of patients visiting emergency department during COVID-19 periods of pandemic. @*Materials and Methods@#This research was conducted through a retrospective chart analysis provided by a public medical center with 502 beds since the first report of a COVID-19 confirmed case on January 19, 2020 to June 15, 2020 in Seoul, the capital of Korea. Our emergency department was designed based on Korean Regional Emergency Center Facility Standards, and modified throughout each phases of COVID-19 outbreak. Patients suspected to be infectious are screened in the triage, separating them from general patients, and then receive isolation treatment in isolated wards. @*Results@#A total of 4,352 patients visited the ED. 3,202 screenings were conducted with 5 confirmed cases. Another 1,150 patients were treated with general emergent symptoms.There were no problems such as closure of the emergency department or isolation of medical staff while managing COVID-19 confirmed patients. @*Conclusion@#Improving emergency department facilities, create an operational program to respond to each phase of COVID-19 outbreak and implement educational programs enabled large number of screening tests and hospitalization for COVID-19 suspected patients while maintaining general medical services. Research in emergency department designs and operational programs should increase to combine research data with better ideas to respond not only during regular periods but also during periods of pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Background@#According to the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic experience, many emergency departments experience difficulties in responding to emerging infectious diseases and this has led to a public health crisis. Our emergency department (ED) is designed to respond to mass outbreaks of infection. Three major preparations were taken to respond to infectious disease; first, to improve the emergency department facilities;second, to created programs to respond to each phase of an epidemic of COVID-19; lastly, to implemented education and training to promote the safety of medical staff. We would like to share the actual responses and statistics of patients visiting emergency department during COVID-19 periods of pandemic. @*Materials and Methods@#This research was conducted through a retrospective chart analysis provided by a public medical center with 502 beds since the first report of a COVID-19 confirmed case on January 19, 2020 to June 15, 2020 in Seoul, the capital of Korea. Our emergency department was designed based on Korean Regional Emergency Center Facility Standards, and modified throughout each phases of COVID-19 outbreak. Patients suspected to be infectious are screened in the triage, separating them from general patients, and then receive isolation treatment in isolated wards. @*Results@#A total of 4,352 patients visited the ED. 3,202 screenings were conducted with 5 confirmed cases. Another 1,150 patients were treated with general emergent symptoms.There were no problems such as closure of the emergency department or isolation of medical staff while managing COVID-19 confirmed patients. @*Conclusion@#Improving emergency department facilities, create an operational program to respond to each phase of COVID-19 outbreak and implement educational programs enabled large number of screening tests and hospitalization for COVID-19 suspected patients while maintaining general medical services. Research in emergency department designs and operational programs should increase to combine research data with better ideas to respond not only during regular periods but also during periods of pandemic.